When it’s exam time you need the right information in the right format to study efficiently and effectively. Emanuel® CrunchTime is the perfect tool for exam studying. With flowcharts and capsule summaries of major points of law and critical issues, as well as exam tips for identifying common traps and pitfalls, sample exam and essay questions with model answers – you will be prepared for your next big test. 

Emanuel CrunchTime® for Criminal Procedure, Eleventh Edition, focuses on those topics that are important in today’s courses on Constitutional Law. 

ABOUT THE BOOK—TOOLS TO SUCCEED 

• Flow charts illustrate principles and concepts 
• A capsule summary explains the major topics and issues covered in the course 
• Exam Tips teach you how to avoid common traps and pitfalls 
• Short-answer questions (with answers) provide an opportunity to test your knowledge 
• Multiple-choices questions in the style of questions on the Multistate Bar Exam (with detailed answers) build your exam-taking skills and confidence 
• Essay questions with model answers help you review and prepare for exams 

This edition has been updated to reflect changes in the law, in casebooks, and topics tested on exams. New to the Eleventh Edition of CrunchTime® for Criminal Procedureis extensive coverage of several important recent cases and developments, including: 

• Recent lower-court cases interpreting the 2018 decision in Carpenter v. U.S., under which government demands for a suspect’s personal data held by a non-governmental third party (e.g., a cellphone company) must sometimes be supported by a search warrant and probable cause. 
• Mitchell v. Wisconsin, holding that police do not require a search warrant before performing a blood-alcohol test of a driver who is so drunk as to be unconscious. 
• 42 U.S.C. §1983, a statute that sometimes allows people whose Fourth Amendment or other constitutional rights have been violated by a police officer to bring a civil suit for money damages against the officer. 
• Samia v. U.S., covering the situation in which two defendants are tried together for the same crime, and the prosecution wants to present to the jury a confession by one defendant (who doesn’t take the stand) and that also implicates the second defendant.  
• Claims of “selective prosecution,” including why it’s virtually impossible for a defendant to successfully assert such claims.