Because Knetbooks knows college students. Our rental program is designed to save you time and money. Whether you need a textbook for a semester, quarter or even a summer session, we have an option for you. Simply select a rental period, enter your information and your book will be on its way!
| Foreword to the First Edition | p. ix |
| Preface to the First Edition: do you need to read this book? | p. xii |
| Preface to the Fourth Edition | p. xiv |
| Acknowledgements | p. xvi |
| Why read papers at all? | p. 1 |
| Does 'evidence-based medicine' simply mean 'reading papers in medical journals'? | p. 1 |
| Why do people sometimes groan when you mention EBM? | p. 3 |
| Before you start: formu... MORE | p. 9 |
| Searching the literature | p. 15 |
| What are you looking for? | p. 16 |
| Levels upon levels of evidence | p. 18 |
| Synthesised sources: systems, summaries and syntheses | p. 19 |
| Pre-appraised sources: synopses of systematic reviews and primary studies | p. 23 |
| Specialised resources | p. 23 |
| Primary studies - tackling the jungle | p. 24 |
| One-stop shopping: federated search engines | p. 28 |
| Asking for help and asking around | p. 28 |
| Getting your bearings - what is this paper about? | p. 31 |
| The science of 'trashing' papers | p. 31 |
| Three preliminary question to get your bearings | p. 33 |
| Randomised controlled trials | p. 36 |
| Cohort studies | p. 40 |
| Case-control studies | p. 41 |
| Cross-sectional surveys | p. 42 |
| Case reports | p. 42 |
| The traditional hierarchy of evidence | p. 43 |
| A note on ethical considerations | p. 44 |
| Assessing methodological quality | p. 47 |
| Was the study original? | p. 47 |
| Whom is the study about? | p. 48 |
| Was the design of the study sensible? | p. 49 |
| Was systematic bias avoided or minimised? | p. 51 |
| Was assessment 'blind'? | p. 54 |
| Were preliminary statistical questions addressed? | p. 55 |
| Summing up | p. 58 |
| Statistics for the non-statistician | p. 61 |
| How can non-statisticians evaluate statistical tests? | p. 61 |
| Have the authors set the scene correctly? | p. 62 |
| Paired data, tails, and outliers | p. 68 |
| Correlation, regression and causation | p. 70 |
| Probability and confidence | p. 72 |
| The bottom line | p. 74 |
| Summary | p. 76 |
| Papers that report trials of drug treatments and other simple interventions | p. 78 |
| 'Evidence' and marketing | p. 78 |
| Making decisions about therapy | p. 80 |
| Surrogate endpoints | p. 81 |
| What information to expect in a paper describing an RCT: the CONSORT statement | p. 84 |
| Getting worthwhile evidence out of a pharmaceutical representative | p. 84 |
| Papers that report trials of complex interventions | p. 90 |
| Complex interventions | p. 90 |
| Ten questions to ask about a paper describing a complex intervention | p. 92 |
| Papers that report diagnostic or screening tests | p. 98 |
| Ten men in the dock | p. 98 |
| Validating diagnostic tests against a gold standard | p. 99 |
| Ten questions to ask about a paper that claims to validate a diagnostic or screening test | p. 103 |
| Likelihood ratios | p. 108 |
| Clinical prediction rules | p. 109 |
| Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses) | p. 113 |
| When is a review systematic? | p. 113 |
| Evaluating systematic reviews | p. 116 |
| Meta-analysis for the non-statistician | p. 121 |
| Explaining heterogeneity | p. 125 |
| New approaches to systematic review | p. 128 |
| Papers that tell you what to do (guidelines) | p. 132 |
| The great guidelines debate | p. 132 |
| How can we help ensure that evidence-based guidelines are followed? | p. 135 |
| Ten questions to ask about a clinical guideline | p. 139 |
| Papers that tell you what things cost (economic analyses) | p. 149 |
| What is an economic analysis? | p. 149 |
| Measuring the costs and benefits of health interventions | p. 151 |
| Ten questions to ask about an economic analysis | p. 156 |
| Conclusion | p. 160 |
| Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research) | p. 163 |
| What is qualitative research? | p. 163 |
| Evaluating papers that describe qualitative research | p. 167 |
| Conclusion | p. 174 |
| Papers that report questionnaire research | p. 177 |
| The rise and rise of questionnaire research | p. 177 |
| Ten questions to ask about a paper describing a questionnaire study | p. 178 |
| Papers that report quality improvement case studies | p. 188 |
| What are quality improvement studies - and how should we research them? | p. 188 |
| Ten questions to ask about a paper describing a quality improvement initiative | p. 190 |
| Conclusion | p. 197 |
| Getting evidence into practice | p. 199 |
| Why are health professionals slow to adopt evidence-based practice? | p. 199 |
| How much avoidable suffering is caused by failing to implement evidence? | p. 201 |
| How can we influence health professionals' behaviour to promote evidence-based practice? | p. 202 |
| What does an 'evidence-based organisation' look like? | p. 208 |
| How can we help organisations develop the appropriate structures, systems and values to support evidence-based practice? | p. 209 |
| Why is it so hard to get evidence into policymaking? | p. 214 |
| Checklists for finding, appraising and implementing evidence | p. 221 |
| Assessing the effects of an intervention | p. 230 |
| Index | p. 231 |
| Table of Contents provided by Ingram. All Rights Reserved. |