
Because Knetbooks knows college students. Our rental program is designed to save you time and money. Whether you need a textbook for a semester, quarter or even a summer session, we have an option for you. Simply select a rental period, enter your information and your book will be on its way!
| Preface to the New Edition | p. xvii |
| Preface to the First Edition | p. xix |
| The Basics of Teamwork | p. 1 |
| Teams in Organizations: Facts and Myths | p. 3 |
| What Is a Team? | p. 4 |
| Why Should Organizations Have Teams? | p. 5 |
| Customer service focus | p. 5 |
| Competition | p. 6 |
| Information age | p. 6 |
| Globalization | p. 7 |
| Types of Teams in Organizations | p. 7 |
| Manager-led teams | p. 7 |
| Self-managing teams | p. 8 |
| Self-directing teams | p. 9 |
| Self-governing teams | p. 10 |
| Some Observations about Teams and Teamwork | p. 11 |
| Teams are not always the answer | p. 11 |
| Managers fault the wrong causes for team failure | p. 11 |
| Managers fail to recognize their team-building responsibilities | p. 12 |
| Experimenting with failures leads to better teams | p. 12 |
| Conflict among team members is not always a bad thing | p. 12 |
| Strong leadership is not always necessary for strong teams | p. 13 |
| Good teams can still fail under the wrong circumstances | p. 14 |
| Retreats will not fix all the conflicts between team members | p. 14 |
| What Leaders Tell Us about Their Teams | p. 15 |
| Most common type of team | p. 15 |
| Team size | p. 15 |
| Team autonomy versus manager control | p. 15 |
| Team longevity | p. 16 |
| The most frustrating aspect of teamwork | p. 16 |
| Developing Your Team-Building Skills | p. 17 |
| Accurate diagnosis of team problems | p. 17 |
| Theory-based intervention | p. 18 |
| Expert learning | p. 18 |
| A Warning | p. 19 |
| Conclusions | p. 20 |
| Performance and Productivity: Team Performance Criteria and Threats to Productivity | p. 21 |
| An Integrated Model of Successful Team Performance | p. 22 |
| Team context | p. 23 |
| Essential conditions for successful team performance | p. 24 |
| Performance criteria | p. 36 |
| The Team Performance Equation | p. 40 |
| Conclusions | p. 41 |
| Rewarding Teamwork: Compensation and Performance Appraisals | p. 42 |
| Types of Team Pay | p. 44 |
| Incentive pay | p. 45 |
| Recognition | p. 47 |
| Profit sharing | p. 50 |
| Gainsharing | p. 50 |
| Teams and Pay for Performance | p. 51 |
| Team Performance Appraisal | p. 52 |
| What is measured? | p. 53 |
| Who does the measuring? | p. 54 |
| Developing a 360-degree program | p. 56 |
| Rater Bias | p. 59 |
| Inflation bias | p. 59 |
| Extrinsic incentives bias | p. 59 |
| Homogeneity bias | p. 60 |
| Halo bias | p. 61 |
| Fundamental attribution error | p. 61 |
| Communication medium | p. 61 |
| Experience effect | p. 61 |
| Reciprocity bias | p. 61 |
| Bandwagon bias | p. 61 |
| Primacy and recency bias | p. 62 |
| Ratee Bias | p. 62 |
| Egocentric bias | p. 62 |
| Intrinsic interest | p. 62 |
| Social comparison | p. 63 |
| Fairness | p. 63 |
| Guiding Principles | p. 64 |
| Goals should cover areas that team members can directly affect | p. 64 |
| Balance the mix of individual and team-based pay | p. 64 |
| Consult with the team members who will be affected | p. 64 |
| Avoid organizational myopia | p. 65 |
| Determine eligibility (who qualifies for the plan) | p. 65 |
| Determine equity method | p. 65 |
| Quantify the criteria used to determine payout | p. 65 |
| Determine how target levels of performance are established and updated | p. 65 |
| Develop a budget for the plan | p. 67 |
| Determine timing of measurements and payments | p. 67 |
| Communicate with those involved | p. 67 |
| Plan for the future | p. 67 |
| Conclusions | p. 67 |
| Internal Dynamics | p. 69 |
| Building the Team: Tasks, People, and Relationships | p. 71 |
| Building the Team | p. 72 |
| The Task: What Work Needs to Be Done? | p. 73 |
| How much authority does the team have to manage its own work? | p. 74 |
| What is the focus of the work the team will do? | p. 74 |
| What is the degree of task interdependence among team members? | p. 75 |
| Is there a correct solution that can be readily demonstrated and communicated to members? | p. 77 |
| Are team members' interests perfectly aligned (cooperative), opposing (competitive), or mixed in nature? | p. 77 |
| How big should the team be? | p. 77 |
| The People: Who Is Ideally Suited to Do the Work? | p. 78 |
| Diversity | p. 80 |
| Relationships: How Do Team Members Socialize Each Other? | p. 85 |
| Group socialization | p. 86 |
| Role negotiation | p. 88 |
| Team norms: Development and enforcement | p. 90 |
| Cohesion: Team bonding | p. 91 |
| Trust | p. 93 |
| Turnover and reorganizations | p. 96 |
| Conclusions | p. 97 |
| Sharpening the Team Mind: Communication and Collective Intelligence | p. 98 |
| Team Communication | p. 99 |
| Message tuning | p. 100 |
| Message distortion | p. 100 |
| Biased interpretation | p. 101 |
| Perspective-taking failures | p. 101 |
| Transparency illusion | p. 102 |
| Indirect speech acts | p. 102 |
| Uneven communication | p. 103 |
| Intellectual Bandwidth | p. 103 |
| The Information Dependence Problem | p. 104 |
| The common information effect | p. 105 |
| Hidden profile | p. 107 |
| Practices to put in place | p. 110 |
| Collective Intelligence | p. 113 |
| Team mental models | p. 113 |
| The team mind: Transactive memory systems | p. 115 |
| Team Longevity: Routinization versus Innovation Trade-offs | p. 122 |
| Conclusions | p. 125 |
| Team Decision Making: Pitfalls and Solutions | p. 126 |
| Decision Making in Teams | p. 127 |
| Individual versus Group Decision Making | p. 128 |
| Decision-Making Pitfall 1: Groupthink | p. 130 |
| Learning from history | p. 132 |
| How to avoid groupthink | p. 134 |
| Decision-Making Pitfall 2: Escalation of Commitment | p. 137 |
| Project determinants | p. 139 |
| Psychological determinants | p. 139 |
| Social determinants | p. 141 |
| Structural determinants | p. 141 |
| Avoiding the escalation of commitment problem | p. 142 |
| Decision-Making Pitfall 3: The Abilene Paradox | p. 143 |
| How to avoid the Abilene paradox | p. 145 |
| Decision-Making Pitfall 4: Group Polarization | p. 147 |
| The need to be right | p. 148 |
| The need to be liked | p. 149 |
| Conformity pressures | p. 149 |
| Decision-Making Pitfall 5: Unethical Decision Making | p. 151 |
| Rational man model | p. 151 |
| Pluralistic ignorance | p. 152 |
| Desensitization | p. 152 |
| Accountability for behavior | p. 152 |
| Reward model | p. 153 |
| Appropriate role models | p. 153 |
| Eliminate conflicts of interest | p. 154 |
| Create cultures of integrity | p. 154 |
| Conclusions | p. 155 |
| Conflict in Teams: Leveraging Differences to Create Opportunity | p. 156 |
| Types of Conflict | p. 157 |
| Types of conflict and work team effectiveness | p. 158 |
| Proportional and perpetual conflict | p. 160 |
| Transforming relationship into task conflict | p. 161 |
| Team Dilemma: Group versus Individual Interests | p. 164 |
| Strategies to enhance cooperation and minimize competition | p. 164 |
| Perils and Pitfalls of Democracy | p. 166 |
| Voting rules | p. 166 |
| Drawbacks to voting | p. 168 |
| Coalitions | p. 169 |
| Team Negotiations | p. 169 |
| The BATNA principle | p. 170 |
| Avoid the fixed-pie fallacy | p. 170 |
| Build trust and share information | p. 170 |
| Understand underlying interests | p. 171 |
| Share information | p. 171 |
| Make multiple proposals simultaneously | p. 171 |
| Avoid sequential discussion of issues | p. 172 |
| Construct contingency contracts and leverage differences | p. 172 |
| Search for postsettlement settlements | p. 173 |
| Invoke norms of justice | p. 173 |
| What to Do When Conflict Escalates? | p. 174 |
| Conclusions | p. 176 |
| Creativity: Mastering Strategies for High Performance | p. 177 |
| Creative Realism | p. 178 |
| Measuring Creativity | p. 180 |
| Convergent and divergent thinking | p. 181 |
| Exploration and exploitation | p. 183 |
| Creativity and context dependence | p. 183 |
| Creative People or Creative Teams? | p. 184 |
| Brainstorming | p. 184 |
| Brainstorming on trial | p. 186 |
| Major Threats to Team Creativity | p. 187 |
| Social loafing | p. 187 |
| Conformity | p. 187 |
| Production blocking | p. 188 |
| Downward norm setting | p. 188 |
| What goes on during a typical group brainstorming session? | p. 189 |
| Enhancing Team Creativity | p. 189 |
| Trained facilitators | p. 190 |
| High benchmarks | p. 190 |
| Brainwriting | p. 190 |
| Nominal group technique | p. 191 |
| Diversify the team | p. 193 |
| Analogical reasoning | p. 193 |
| Creating an organizational memory | p. 197 |
| Membership change | p. 198 |
| Build a playground | p. 199 |
| Electronic Brainstorming | p. 200 |
| Advantages of electronic brainstorming | p. 201 |
| Disadvantages of electronic brainstorming | p. 203 |
| Capstone on brainstorming | p. 204 |
| Conclusions | p. 205 |
| External Dynamics | p. 207 |
| Networking, Social Capital, and Integrating across Teams | p. 209 |
| Team Boundaries | p. 210 |
| Insulating teams | p. 211 |
| Broadcasting teams | p. 212 |
| Marketing teams | p. 212 |
| Surveying teams | p. 212 |
| External Roles of Team Members | p. 214 |
| Knowledge Valuation | p. 214 |
| Networking: A Key to Successful Teamwork | p. 216 |
| Communication | p. 216 |
| Human capital and social capital | p. 217 |
| The importance of boundary spanning | p. 219 |
| Cliques versus boundary-spanning networks: Advantages and disadvantages | p. 220 |
| Advice for the manager | p. 222 |
| Structural positioning | p. 223 |
| Relationships Outside the Team | p. 228 |
| Distance | p. 228 |
| Time | p. 230 |
| Conclusions | p. 230 |
| Leadership: Managing the Paradox | p. 232 |
| Leaders and the Nature-Nurture Debate: Great Person versus Great Opportunity | p. 234 |
| Leadership Styles | p. 236 |
| Task versus person leadership | p. 237 |
| Transactional versus Transformational Leadership | p. 237 |
| Active versus passive leadership | p. 240 |
| Autocratic versus democratic leadership | p. 241 |
| Team Coaching | p. 241 |
| Types of coaching | p. 241 |
| Leadership and Power | p. 242 |
| Sources of power | p. 243 |
| Using power | p. 243 |
| Decision Analysis Model: How Participative Do You Want to Be? | p. 245 |
| Decision styles | p. 245 |
| Problem identification | p. 245 |
| Decision tree model | p. 247 |
| Strategies for Encouraging Participative Management | p. 247 |
| Task delegation | p. 250 |
| Parallel suggestion involvement | p. 250 |
| Job involvement | p. 252 |
| Organizational involvement | p. 252 |
| Conclusions | p. 257 |
| Interteam Relations: Competition and Cooperation | p. 258 |
| Personal and Team Identity | p. 258 |
| Intrateam and interteam respect | p. 259 |
| Independence versus interdependence | p. 260 |
| Self-interest versus group-interest | p. 260 |
| Ingroups and outgroups | p. 261 |
| Balancing the need to belong and the need to be distinct | p. 262 |
| Interteam Relationships | p. 262 |
| Social comparison processes | p. 263 |
| Post-merger behavior | p. 263 |
| Intergroup conflict | p. 265 |
| When and Why Conflict Is Good | p. 267 |
| Cohesion | p. 267 |
| How and why organizations benefit from minority viewpoints | p. 267 |
| Biases Associated with Intergroup Conflict | p. 268 |
| Categorization: Us versus them | p. 268 |
| Ingroup bias (or "We are better than them") | p. 269 |
| Racism and racial discrimination | p. 270 |
| Denial | p. 270 |
| "They all look alike": The outgroup homogeneity bias | p. 271 |
| Strategies for Reducing Negative Effects of Intergroup Conflict | p. 272 |
| Contact | p. 272 |
| Cross-cut role assignments | p. 273 |
| Conclusions | p. 273 |
| Teamwork via Information Technology: Challenges and Opportunities | p. 275 |
| Place-Time Model of Social Interaction | p. 276 |
| Face-to-face communication | p. 277 |
| Same time, different place | p. 279 |
| Different time, same place | p. 281 |
| Different place, different time | p. 282 |
| Information Technology and Social Behavior | p. 284 |
| Reduced status differences: The "weak get strong" effect | p. 285 |
| Equalization of team members' participation | p. 285 |
| Technology can lead to face-to-face meetings | p. 286 |
| Increased time to make decisions | p. 286 |
| Communication | p. 286 |
| Risk taking | p. 287 |
| Social norms | p. 287 |
| Task performance and quality of group decisions | p. 288 |
| Enhancing Local Teamwork: Redesigning the Workplace | p. 288 |
| Virtual or flexible space | p. 289 |
| Flexible furniture | p. 290 |
| Hoteling | p. 290 |
| Virtual Teams | p. 292 |
| Strategies for Enhancing the Virtual Team | p. 293 |
| Collaboratory | p. 293 |
| Virtual team technology | p. 293 |
| Initial face-to-face experience | p. 294 |
| Temporary engagement | p. 294 |
| One-day videoconference | p. 295 |
| Touching base | p. 295 |
| Schmoozing | p. 296 |
| Transnational Teams | p. 296 |
| Conclusions | p. 298 |
| Managing Meetings: A Toolkit | p. 301 |
| Tips for Consultants and Facilitators | p. 308 |
| A Guide for Creating Effective Study Groups | p. 312 |
| Example Items from Peer Evaluations and 360-Degree Performance Evaluations | p. 315 |
| References | p. 322 |
| Author Index | p. 361 |
| Subject Index | p. 369 |
| Table of Contents provided by Ingram. All Rights Reserved. |